Evaluation Summary
Company Insights
Seventh Generation is owned by the multinational conglomerate Unilever. Normally we don’t evaluate brands. But we’re making an exception in this case given the legacy of the company when it comes to their long-standing advocacy efforts related to ingredient safety as well as being a founding B-Corp. In fact, a number of years ago (prior to Hilde) we worked directly with the company on legislative campaigns that helped pass news laws making cleaning products safer. While the parent company Unilever stands out on their environmental impact, worker fairness, and corporate accountability efforts, we were disappointed with what we found related to their approach to ingredient safety. In contrast, Seventh Generation appears to take a more precautionary approach to how they select ingredients for their products. We like that they use a more trustworthy certification (Safer Choice) across much of their portfolio of products. Although Seventh Generation is a unique situation given their ownership, we feel comfortable considering their products for use in our homes given their more robust approach to safety. You can see that in some evaluation categories (e.g. worker fairness, accountability), Seventh Generation did not score as well as their parent company. We think that is likely the result of efforts and information about those areas of impact being addressed by Unilever rather than Seventh Generation.
Ingredient Safety
Hilde Likes
Going beyond basic safety regulations
This company’s approach to ingredient safety appears to go beyond regulations to address unregulated or under-regulated chemicals of concern
Verified ingredient safety efforts
This company makes a significant number of products that have at least one high-quality ingredient safety certification
Opportunities for Improvement
Transitioning to a more protective ingredient safety approach
This company has a framework for evaluating ingredient safety but we would like to see them move from a risk-based approach to a more precautionary one based on hazard
Utilizing a restricted substances list
We think this company should develop and disclose a comprehensive list of the ingredients or chemicals that they restrict from their products and supply chain as well as the rationale behind their list
Category Definition
Our ingredient safety evaluation criteria are designed to help us determine how a company measures, manages, and discloses, the use of chemicals of concern that may be present in raw materials, ingredients, manufacturing processes, and finished products.
Foundational Gaps
The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.
Solid Baseline
The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.
Strong Performance:
The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.
Hilde Likes
Going beyond basic safety regulations
Verified ingredient safety efforts
Opportunities for Improvement
Transitioning to a more protective ingredient safety approach
Utilizing a restricted substances list
Environmental Impact
Hilde Likes
Taking climate action seriously
This company has a great foundation in place when it comes to climate including measuring all greenhouse gas emissions, setting some near-term targets, and reducing their emissions over time
Taking steps to reduce packaging impacts
This company is taking some good initial steps to reduce the environmental impacts of their packaging like using post-consumer recycled raw materials, offering refills, or other relevant efforts
Verified environmental impact reduction efforts
This company makes a significant number of products or uses a higher percentage of raw materials and ingredients in their products that feature a higher quality certification related to environmental impacts
Opportunities for Improvement
Formalizing biodiversity protection efforts
We would like to see this company build on their initial efforts related to more sustainable raw materials production by establishing an internal biodiversity protection policy and goal
Measure and report on performance related to biodiversity protection
This company has a solid foundation in place related to protecting biodiversity, but we would like to see them measure progress on their responsible wood procurement commitment and include in annual sustainability report
Category Definition
Our environmental impact reduction evaluation criteria are designed to help us determine how a company measures, manages, and discloses information about the impacts that their operations, products, and supply chain may have on our air, land, water, and ecosystems.
Foundational Gaps
The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.
Solid Baseline
The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.
Strong Performance:
The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.
Hilde Likes
Taking climate action seriously
Taking steps to reduce packaging impacts
Verified environmental impact reduction efforts
Opportunities for Improvement
Formalizing biodiversity protection efforts
Measure and report on performance related to biodiversity protection
Worker Fairness
Hilde Likes
Commitment to living wages
We respect that this company has publicly committed to providing living wages for their employees and people who are employed by companies in their supply chain
Opportunities for Improvement
Verification of worker fairness efforts
This company should start using or expand their use of high-quality certifications related to strengthen their claims related to worker fairness
Better information to support worker fairness claims
We would like to see more and better information including quantitative substantiation related to this company's worker fairness claims
Category Definition
Our worker fairness evaluation criteria are designed to help us determine how a company measures, manages, and discloses information about the way they treat their employees, workers in their supply chain, and other stakeholders.
Foundational Gaps
The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.
Solid Baseline
The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.
Strong Performance:
The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.
Hilde Likes
Commitment to living wages
Opportunities for Improvement
Verification of worker fairness efforts
Better information to support worker fairness claims
Accountability
Hilde Likes
Commitment to ethical business practices
We value that this company is a certified B-Corp because it demonstrates a credible commitment to pursuing ethical business practices
Mission alignment with sustainability
We appreciate that this company has included safety and sustainability as part of their mission
Opportunities for Improvement
Adopting a context-based approach to sustainability
We think this company is ready to take a leadership position by measuring and managing performance against planetary boundaries and thresholds to assess true operational sustainability
Category Defition
Our corporate accountability evaluation criteria are designed to help us determine how a company integrates sustainability across their organization to help govern decision making and engage with external stakeholders in socially responsible ways.
Foundational Gaps
The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.
Solid Baseline
The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.
Strong Performance:
The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.
Hilde Likes
Commitment to ethical business practices
Mission alignment with sustainability
Opportunities for Improvement
Adopting a context-based approach to sustainability
