Saatva

Evaluation Completed: 
November 4, 2025

We’re concerned about the validity of many of the ingredient safety and sustainability claims made by this company. During our research, we noted several inconsistencies that were major red flags. For example, we found two instances where the company appears to claim their products have certifications (e.g.Cradle to Cradle, Global Organic Textile Standard). A search of the public databases maintained by the certifying organizations, in this case the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute and Global Standard gGmbH did not confirm those certification claims. This is standard practice for Hilde. We attempt to verify with the certifying body itself when a company claims that they and/or their products have received a high-quality certification. Our rating reflects numerous other gaps in their approaches to ingredient safety and sustainability.

Hilde Status:

Avoid

Consider

Recommended

We try to avoid purchasing or using products made by this company or their brands in our homes.
We may decide to purchase or use products made by this company or their brands in our homes when other options are not accessible.
Hilde Ratings
Topic
Rating
Ingredient Safety
Environmental impact
People Benefits
Accountability
Hilde Approved Certifications
No Hilde approved certifications included
Hilde Likes

Emphasis on some relevant chemicals of concern

Public disclosure and reporting

Opportunities for Improvement

Setting packaging sustainability targets

Integrating sustainability into the mission

Securing sustainability data & reporting assurance

Crafting a strong Supplier Code of Conduct

Launching climate protection efforts

Tackling advanced ingredient safety issues

Improving producer responsibility

Filling gaps on people impacts

Establishing good governance practices

Better claims substantiation for people benefits

Verification of ingredient safety efforts

Adopting a comprehensive approach to ingredient safety

Launching efforts to protect biodiversity

Additional Information
Parent Company:
None
Owned Brands:
None
Product Types:
Mattresses, bed frames, chairs, rugs, mattress pads & toppers, bedding, pillows

Evaluation Summary

Company Insights

Category Description

Our ingredient safety evaluation criteria are designed to help us determine how a company measures, manages, and discloses, the use of chemicals of concern that may be present in raw materials, ingredients, manufacturing processes, and finished products.

Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Criteria included in this category include but are not limited to goals, policies, practices and outcomes for the following topics:

Product & Packaging Circularity
Climate Protection, Biodiversity Protection
Goals & Metrics
Impact Reduction
High Quality Certifications
Other Topics
Ranking: Top 25%

Company ranks in the top 25% of companies currently rated by Hilde in the

Furniture

industry

Ranking: Bottom 25%

Company ranks in the bottom 25% of companies currently rated by Hilde in the

Furniture

industry

Hilde Likes
None Identified
Opportunities for Improvement

Improving producer responsibility

Given the hard to recycle nature of many kinds of the products this company makes and sells we would like to see this company provide a manufacturer takeback or recovery program beyond what is required by state or local laws

Launching climate protection efforts

We would like to see this company take credible actions to measure, reduce, and report on their greenhouse gas emissions

Launching efforts to protect biodiversity

We would like to see this company take steps to understand and mitigate the impacts their operations, supply chain, or products have on biodiversity, nature, and ecosystems and communicate about them publicly

Setting packaging sustainability targets

We think this company should start to set time-bound goals for reducing the environmental impacts of their packaging and publicly report on their progress towards them

Category Description

Our ingredient safety evaluation criteria are designed to help us determine how a company measures, manages, and discloses, the use of chemicals of concern that may be present in raw materials, ingredients, manufacturing processes, and finished products.

Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Criteria included in this category include but are not limited to goals, policies, practices and outcomes for the following topics:

Responsible Sourcing
Living Wages
Paid Maternity Leave
Supply Chain Transparency
High Quality Certifications
Other Topics
Ranking: Top 25%

Company ranks in the top 25% of companies currently rated by Hilde in the

Furniture

industry

Ranking: Bottom 25%

Company ranks in the bottom 25% of companies currently rated by Hilde in the

Furniture

industry

Hilde Likes
None Identified
Opportunities for Improvement

Crafting a strong Supplier Code of Conduct

We think this company should craft or revise their existing code of conduct to align with recognized international standards

Filling gaps on people impacts

We believe this company should put credible efforts in place to ensure that their employees are treated fairly, that human rights are protected for people in their supply chain, raw materials are sourced responsibly, and publicly share info about their work

Better claims substantiation for people benefits

More transparency by the company is needed related to their claims for people benefits topics because we were unable to find sufficient publicly available substantiation for some criteria

Category Description

Our ingredient safety evaluation criteria are designed to help us determine how a company measures, manages, and discloses, the use of chemicals of concern that may be present in raw materials, ingredients, manufacturing processes, and finished products.

Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Criteria included in this category include but are not limited to goals, policies, practices and outcomes for the following topics:

Mission Integration
Advocacy
Public Reporting & Disclosure
Performance Incentives
Ethical AI
High Quality Certifications
Ranking: Top 25%

Company ranks in the top 25% of companies currently rated by Hilde in the

Furniture

industry

Ranking: Bottom 25%

Company ranks in the bottom 25% of companies currently rated by Hilde in the

Furniture

industry

Hilde Likes

Public disclosure and reporting

This company provides helpful disclosure on their efforts through annual reporting on sustainability or ESG topics for consumers or other stakeholders

Opportunities for Improvement

Integrating sustainability into the mission

This company could boost their credibility and accelerate meaningful action on sustainability issues by making it an explicit part of their mission, purpose, or values

Securing sustainability data & reporting assurance

We think this company should strengthen the credibility of the data and information they report related to their sustainability performance by having it audited and assured by an independent external organization

Establishing good governance practices

We think this company should integrate sustainability into the business model and decision making while enabling accountability mechanisms at the executive and board level

Category Description

Our ingredient safety evaluation criteria are designed to help us determine how a company measures, manages, and discloses, the use of chemicals of concern that may be present in raw materials, ingredients, manufacturing processes, and finished products.

Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Real people (not AI) do our evaluations. If you think you see something we missed, please contact us. You can read more about our company evaluation methods and check some of the limitations of our evaluations. The content on this site, including for example the evaluations and ratings, are for informational purposes and represent solely the opinions of Hilde. They do not represent endorsements or investment advice. Hilde makes no promises regarding the content of its site, including without limitation its accuracy, quality, completeness, and timeliness. Accordingly, Hilde is not liable for any loss or damage that might arise from reliance on the content of the site. For more information, visit our Terms of use.