Evaluation Summary
Company Insights
We found out about Meliora Cleaning Products by browsing through a list of Made Safe certified products one afternoon. That got us interested in learning more about the company. And what we found through our research was an impressive commitment to ingredient safety, sustainability, and accountability. These are particularly notable efforts given the relatively small size of the company. They clearly care and this company appears to be walking the talk when it comes to many of the issues that matter. For starters, the company is a certified B-Corp. Also, we are impressed by the fact the company takes packaging waste reduction seriously avoiding plastic in nearly all of their packaging. We like that they prioritize organic ingredients and provide good transparency about where they are grown or sourced. We’re excited to find a new cleaning & laundry products company that we can invite into our homes.
Ingredient Safety
Hilde Likes
Best-in-class ingredient safety certifications
This company makes a significant number of products that have a best-in-class ingredient safety certification
Comprehensive approach to ingredient safety
We value that this company publicly shares a comprehensive and precautionary chemicals policy, ingredient safety standard, or similar
Providing full ingredient disclosure
Telling people what is in your products is a basic (but sometimes missing) step towards safer products
Opportunities for Improvement
Adopting ingredient safety goals & metrics
We would like to see this company develop and publicly disclose a goal and relevant metrics to help measure progress on their ingredient safety efforts
Category Definition
Our ingredient safety evaluation criteria are designed to help us determine how a company measures, manages, and discloses, the use of chemicals of concern that may be present in raw materials, ingredients, manufacturing processes, and finished products.
Foundational Gaps
The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.
Solid Baseline
The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.
Strong Performance:
The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.
Environmental Impact
Hilde Likes
Innovative approaches to more circular products
This brand is showing some exciting examples of how the concept of circularity can significantly improve the sustainability of a product - which is notable given how challenging this can be with certain types of products.
Measuring greenhouse gas emissions
This company is taking an important first step by measuring their greenhouse gas emissions using trusted methods
Minimizing plastic use in packaging
This company appears to select packaging materials other than plastic (e.g. paper, glass, metal) when possible
Selecting lower impact raw materials
This brand is starting to consider how raw materials affect the environmental footprint of their products and make better decisions
Opportunities for Improvement
Formalizing biodiversity protection efforts
We would like to see this company build on their initial efforts related to more sustainable raw materials production by establishing an internal biodiversity protection policy and goal
Category Definition
Our environmental impact reduction evaluation criteria are designed to help us determine how a company measures, manages, and discloses information about the impacts that their operations, products, and supply chain may have on our air, land, water, and ecosystems.
Foundational Gaps
The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.
Solid Baseline
The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.
Strong Performance:
The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.
Worker Fairness
Hilde Likes
Commitment to living wages
We respect that this company has publicly committed to providing living wages for their employees and people who are employed by companies in their supply chain
More supply chain transparency
This company provides some useful information about where they source raw materials and where their products are manufactured
Opportunities for Improvement
Launching a responsible sourcing program
We would like this company to launch a responsible sourcing program that includes an internal policy, defines higher-risk raw materials, and their process for mitigating impacts to people & the planet
Providing paid parental leave
We would like to see this company adopt a paid parental leave policy for their employees that goes beyond minimum legal requirements and share it publicly
Category Definition
Our worker fairness evaluation criteria are designed to help us determine how a company measures, manages, and discloses information about the way they treat their employees, workers in their supply chain, and other stakeholders.
Foundational Gaps
The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.
Solid Baseline
The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.
Strong Performance:
The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.
Accountability
Hilde Likes
Public disclosure and reporting
This company provides helpful disclosure on their efforts through annual reporting on sustainability or ESG topics for consumers or other stakeholders
Commitment to ethical business practices
We value that this company is a certified B-Corp because it demonstrates a credible commitment to pursuing ethical business practices
Opportunities for Improvement
Securing sustainability data & reporting assurance
We think this company should strengthen the credibility of the data and information they report related to their sustainability performance by having it audited and assured by an independent external organization
Category Defition
Our corporate accountability evaluation criteria are designed to help us determine how a company integrates sustainability across their organization to help govern decision making and engage with external stakeholders in socially responsible ways.
Foundational Gaps
The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.
Solid Baseline
The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.
Strong Performance:
The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.
