Evaluation Summary
Company Insights
Malacasa makes a number of claims related to the safety of their products, including asserting that they are lead and cadmium free. However, based on our research they don’t appear to provide any company-specific information about their ingredient and material safety or sustainability practices. Instead, they feature lots of content on their blog about these topics which appears to be designed to give consumers the impression that the company is taking action. None of that content is linked to information or data about Malacasa itself. Unfortunately, this “implied performance” strategy can be misleading and may be a form of greenwashing.
Hilde was not able to find any credible, publicly available information about the ingredient safety, sustainability, or accountability efforts at Malacasa during our research. In instances where the company does provide information about these topics, it was not relevant to any of the criteria included in our evaluation. Work on these issues may be occurring at the company but our research did not readily locate information about it at the time we conducted our review. Our research included but was not limited to reviewing content on webpages, reading company blog posts, looking through FAQs when available, doing sitewide keyword searches, and checking for reports across the website(s) that appear to be owned and operated by the company. We hope this company provides greater transparency about these important issues in the future.
Ingredient Safety
Hilde Likes
Opportunities for Improvement
Category Definition
Our ingredient safety evaluation criteria are designed to help us determine how a company measures, manages, and discloses, the use of chemicals of concern that may be present in raw materials, ingredients, manufacturing processes, and finished products.
Foundational Gaps
The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.
Solid Baseline
The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.
Strong Performance:
The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.
Hilde Likes
Opportunities for Improvement
Environmental Impact
Hilde Likes
Opportunities for Improvement
Category Definition
Our environmental impact reduction evaluation criteria are designed to help us determine how a company measures, manages, and discloses information about the impacts that their operations, products, and supply chain may have on our air, land, water, and ecosystems.
Foundational Gaps
The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.
Solid Baseline
The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.
Strong Performance:
The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.
Hilde Likes
Opportunities for Improvement
Worker Fairness
Hilde Likes
Opportunities for Improvement
Category Definition
Our worker fairness evaluation criteria are designed to help us determine how a company measures, manages, and discloses information about the way they treat their employees, workers in their supply chain, and other stakeholders.
Foundational Gaps
The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.
Solid Baseline
The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.
Strong Performance:
The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.
Hilde Likes
Opportunities for Improvement
Accountability
Hilde Likes
Opportunities for Improvement
Category Defition
Our corporate accountability evaluation criteria are designed to help us determine how a company integrates sustainability across their organization to help govern decision making and engage with external stakeholders in socially responsible ways.
Foundational Gaps
The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.
Solid Baseline
The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.
Strong Performance:
The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.
