Ikea

Evaluation Completed: 
May 7, 2025
Adults
Babies
Bathroom
Bedroom
Furniture
Kids
Home Improvement
Kitchen
More Affordable
Moving
New Baby
Office

Put simply: Much of Ikea’s approach to ingredient safety and sustainability really impresses us. We value their science-based approaches to both climate protection as well as biodiversity. They’re solid on people and sourcing. More than most of the brands we evaluate, they are ready to adopt a context-based approach sustainability. With a few enhancements we think Ikea could be an excellent champion and corporate role model for authentic sustainability.

Hilde Status:

Avoid

Consider

Recommended

We try to avoid purchasing or using products made by this company or their brands in our homes.
We may decide to purchase or use products made by this company or their brands in our homes when other options are not accessible.
Hilde Ratings
Topic
Rating
Ingredient Safety
Environmental impact
People Benefits
Governance
Hilde Approved Certifications
Forest Stewardship Council
Hilde Likes

Good focus on people issues

Holistic approach to addressing environmental impacts

Public disclosure and reporting

Solid foundation on ingredient safety

Opportunities for Improvement

Benchmarking ingredient safety practices

Adopting a context-based approach to sustainability

Verification of ingredient safety efforts

Additional Information
Parent Company:
None
Owned Brands:
None
Product Types:
Seating, Cookware, Bedding, Rugs, Decor, Tableware, Lighting, Outdoor, Mattresses, Storage, Office

Evaluation Summary

Basic
Advanced
Leadership
Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Hilde Likes

Solid foundation on ingredient safety

This company appears to do a good job covering the basics and is ready to tackle more advanced topics related to ingredient safety

Opportunities for Improvement

Benchmarking ingredient safety practices

We would like to see this company participate in the Chemical Footprint Policy to help benchmark their policies and practices against other companies publicly share their results

Verification of ingredient safety efforts

This company should start using or expand their use of trustworthy certifications that help verify their claims related to ingredient safety

Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Hilde Likes

Holistic approach to addressing environmental impacts

This company is a top performer in their industry when it comes to tackling the most important environmental impacts associated with their business and supply chain

Opportunities for Improvement
None Identified
Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Hilde Likes

Good focus on people issues

This company appears to have a holistic approach to treating people well including a credible responsible sourcing process to help protect human rights for workers in their supply chain

Opportunities for Improvement
None Identified
Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Hilde Likes

Public disclosure and reporting

This company provides helpful disclosure on their efforts through annual reporting on sustainability or ESG topics for consumers or other stakeholders

Opportunities for Improvement
None Identified

SubscriptReal people (not AI) do our evaluations. If you think you see something we missed, please let us know! You can read more about our company evaluation process here and check some of the limitations of our Evaluations here.The content on this site, including for example the evaluations and ratings, are for informational purposes and represent solely the  opinions of Hilde.  They do not represent endorsements or investment advice. Hilde makes no promises regarding the content of its site, including without limitation its accuracy, quality, completeness, and timeliness.  Accordingly, Hilde is not liable for any loss or damage that might arise from reliance on the content of the site. For more information, visit our Terms of Use.