Farrow & Ball

Evaluation Completed: 
August 6, 2025
Adults
Bathroom
Bedroom
Kitchen
Renovating
Moving

Farrow & Ball is owned by the company Hempel. Hilde evaluates parent companies rather than individual brands. You can read more about why we think this approach is more helpful for consumers on our blog.

Hempel appears to have recently enhanced and expanded their sustainability efforts. We see some solid signs that the company is integrating sustainability into their strategy and operations. They are making some progress on their climate efforts. But the company doesn’t appear to offer much information about ingredient or chemical safety, a topic that is highly relevant given their products. And while the company seems to have real efforts underway on issues related to creating benefits for people we were unable to find the kind of substantiation we need. As a result, they didn’t score particularly well on some of our evaluation criteria in those categories. We did note that they have a rather unique ownership structure, which could allow the company to lean into sustainability in a faster and more effective way than other companies (should they so choose).

Hilde Status:

Avoid

Consider

Recommended

We try to avoid purchasing or using products made by this company or their brands in our homes.
We may decide to purchase or use products made by this company or their brands in our homes when other options are not accessible.
Hilde Ratings
Topic
Rating
Ingredient Safety
Environmental impact
People Benefits
Governance
Hilde Approved Certifications
No Hilde approved certifications included
Hilde Likes

Alternative ownership structure

Emphasis on some relevant chemicals of concern

Informed code of conduct

Strengthening commitment to ethical business

Sustainability data & reporting assurance

Taking climate action seriously

Using circular design thinking

Opportunities for Improvement

Launching a responsible sourcing program

Benchmarking ingredient safety practices

Adopting a context-based approach to sustainability

Verification of environmental impact reduction efforts

Better claims substantiation for people benefits

Verification of ingredient safety efforts

Adopting a comprehensive approach to ingredient safety

Launching efforts to protect biodiversity

Additional Information
Parent Company:
Hempel
Owned Brands:
None
Product Types:
Paints, wallpaper

Evaluation Summary

Basic
Advanced
Leadership
Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Hilde Likes

Emphasis on some relevant chemicals of concern

This brand recognizes that certain kinds or classes of chemicals (e.g. PFAS) should be restricted from the products they make or sell

Opportunities for Improvement

Adopting a comprehensive approach to ingredient safety

We would like to see this brand adopt a precautionary safer chemicals policy, use a publicly available Restricted Substances List, address sources of contaminants, and use laboratory testing to ensure purity and assess compliance

Benchmarking ingredient safety practices

We would like to see this company participate in the Chemical Footprint Policy to help benchmark their policies and practices against other companies publicly share their results

Verification of ingredient safety efforts

This company should start using or expand their use of trustworthy certifications that help verify their claims related to ingredient safety

Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Hilde Likes

Taking climate action seriously

This company has a great foundation in place when it comes to climate including measuring all greenhouse gas emissions, setting some near-term targets, and reducing their emissions over time

Using circular design thinking

We appreciate that this company appears to be integrating more circular approaches to designing and making products and packaging to help reduce environmental impacts

Opportunities for Improvement

Launching efforts to protect biodiversity

We would like to see this company take steps to understand and mitigate the impacts their operations, supply chain, or products have on biodiversity and ecosystems and communicate about them publicly

Verification of environmental impact reduction efforts

This company should start using or expand their use of trustworthy certifications related to strengthen their claims related to environmental impact reduction

Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Hilde Likes

Informed code of conduct

This company has a supplier code of conduct that is based on international guidance from credible sources

Opportunities for Improvement

Launching a responsible sourcing program

We would like this company to launch a responsible sourcing program that includes an internal policy, defines higher-risk raw materials, and their process for mitigating impacts to people & the planet

Better claims substantiation for people benefits

More transparency by the company is needed related to benefits for people topics because we were unable to find sufficient publicly available substantiation for some criteria

Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Hilde Likes

Alternative ownership structure

This company has a unique ownership structure that allows it to engage in sustainability and generate positive impacts that are unique, should they choose to do so

Sustainability data & reporting assurance

This company has an external firm audit and assure the data and information they report related to their sustainability performance

Strengthening commitment to ethical business

We note that at least one brand owned by this company is a certified B-Corp and applaud that achievement but believe it should be more broadly adopted across the company’s portfolio

Opportunities for Improvement
None Identified

SubscriptReal people (not AI) do our evaluations. If you think you see something we missed, please let us know! You can read more about our company evaluation process here and check some of the limitations of our Evaluations here.The content on this site, including for example the evaluations and ratings, are for informational purposes and represent solely the  opinions of Hilde.  They do not represent endorsements or investment advice. Hilde makes no promises regarding the content of its site, including without limitation its accuracy, quality, completeness, and timeliness.  Accordingly, Hilde is not liable for any loss or damage that might arise from reliance on the content of the site. For more information, visit our Terms of Use.