Clek

Evaluation Completed: 
February 19, 2025
Baby
Kids
New Baby

We first found Clek when we were deep in a research rabbit hole before our first child was born. We knew from our time in the NGO world that car seats and other baby products that use foam and textile materials could still be laced with highly toxic chemicals like flame retardants, despite evidence that they were not effective in slowing the spread of fires. Our research indicates that Clek is doing a solid job when it comes to ingredient safety for their products. The company has some opportunities for improvement when it comes to sustainability.

Hilde Status:

Avoid

Consider

Recommended

We try to avoid purchasing or using products made by this company or their brands in our homes.
We may decide to purchase or use products made by this company or their brands in our homes when other options are not accessible.
Hilde Ratings
Topic
Rating
Ingredient Safety
Environmental impact
People Benefits
Governance
Hilde Approved Certifications
OEKO-TEX Standard 100
Forest Stewardship Council
Hilde Likes

Engagement on public policy

Providing the opportunity for responsible recovery

Solid foundation on ingredient safety

Opportunities for Improvement

Launching climate protection efforts

Benchmarking ingredient safety practices

Enhancing product circularity efforts

Providing public disclosure and reporting

Filling gaps on people impacts

Additional Information
Parent Company:
None
Owned Brands:
None
Product Types:
Car seats, booster seats

Evaluation Summary

Basic
Advanced
Leadership
Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Hilde Likes

Solid foundation on ingredient safety

This company appears to do a good job covering the basics and is ready to tackle more advanced topics related to ingredient safety

Opportunities for Improvement

Benchmarking ingredient safety practices

We would like to see this company participate in the Chemical Footprint Policy to help benchmark their policies and practices against other companies publicly share their results

Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Hilde Likes

Providing the opportunity for responsible recovery

This company participates in a product takeback program (but charges a significant fee) to help recover products that are difficult to recycle

Opportunities for Improvement

Enhancing product circularity efforts

This company should build on some of their initial efforts to select raw materials with lower environmental impacts from responsible sources

Launching climate protection efforts

We would like to see this company take credible actions to measure, reduce, and report on their greenhouse gas emissions

Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Hilde Likes
None Identified
Opportunities for Improvement

Filling gaps on people impacts

This company should put credible efforts in place to ensure that their employees are treated fairly, that human rights are protected for people in their supply chain, raw materials are sourced responsibly, and publicly share info about their work

Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Hilde Likes
None Identified
Opportunities for Improvement
None Identified

SubscriptReal people (not AI) do our evaluations. If you think you see something we missed, please let us know! You can read more about our company evaluation process here and check some of the limitations of our Evaluations here.The content on this site, including for example the evaluations and ratings, are for informational purposes and represent solely the  opinions of Hilde.  They do not represent endorsements or investment advice. Hilde makes no promises regarding the content of its site, including without limitation its accuracy, quality, completeness, and timeliness.  Accordingly, Hilde is not liable for any loss or damage that might arise from reliance on the content of the site. For more information, visit our Terms of Use.