Babybjorn

Evaluation Completed: 
April 15, 2025
Baby
Nursery
Bedroom
Kitchen
Furniture
New Baby
Moving

When digging into BabyBjorn we get the sense that it is one of those brands where there is more happening than meets the eye. Our research on this Swedish company shows that they recognize which impacts matter, like reducing their carbon footprint and engaging their supply chain for example. But the information publicly available has some major gaps and is fairly generic. They do appear to have some solid policies and practices in place related to people. We hope to get more detail on their efforts in the future.

Hilde Status:

Avoid

Consider

Recommended

We try to avoid purchasing or using products made by this company or their brands in our homes.
We may decide to purchase or use products made by this company or their brands in our homes when other options are not accessible.
Hilde Ratings
Topic
Rating
Ingredient Safety
Environmental impact
People Benefits
Accountability
Hilde Approved Certifications
OEKO-TEX Standard 100
Hilde Likes

Engagement on public policy

Informed code of conduct

More supply chain transparency

Recognizing the importance of ingredient safety

Science-based climate protection goal

Opportunities for Improvement

Improving climate pollution disclosures

Verification of benefits for people efforts

Enhancing product circularity efforts

Providing public disclosure and reporting

Formalizing biodiversity protection efforts

Adopting a comprehensive approach to ingredient safety

Additional Information
Parent Company:
None
Owned Brands:
None
Product Types:
Baby carriers, baby bouncers, cribs, feeding, potty training

Evaluation Summary

Company Insights

Category Description

Our ingredient safety evaluation criteria are designed to help us determine how a company measures, manages, and discloses, the use of chemicals of concern that may be present in raw materials, ingredients, manufacturing processes, and finished products.

Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Criteria included in this category include but are not limited to goals, policies, practices and outcomes for the following topics:

Product & Packaging Circularity
Climate Protection, Biodiversity Protection
Goals & Metrics
Impact Reduction
High Quality Certifications
Other Topics
Ranking: Top 25%

Company ranks in the top 25% of companies currently rated by Hilde in the

Baby

industry

Ranking: Bottom 25%

Company ranks in the bottom 25% of companies currently rated by Hilde in the

Baby

industry

Hilde Likes

Science-based climate protection goal

We’re happy to see that this company has publicly committed to reducing their carbon footprint in ways that are aligned with the latest science

Opportunities for Improvement

Enhancing product circularity efforts

We believethis company should build on some of their initial efforts to select raw materials with lower environmental impacts from responsible sources

Formalizing biodiversity protection efforts

We would like to see this company build on their initial efforts related to more sustainable raw materials production by establishing an internal biodiversity protection policy and goal

Improving climate pollution disclosures

We think this company should start measuring and publicly disclosing their annual GHG emissions including those from their value chain (Scope 3)

Category Description

Our ingredient safety evaluation criteria are designed to help us determine how a company measures, manages, and discloses, the use of chemicals of concern that may be present in raw materials, ingredients, manufacturing processes, and finished products.

Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Criteria included in this category include but are not limited to goals, policies, practices and outcomes for the following topics:

Responsible Sourcing
Living Wages
Paid Maternity Leave
Supply Chain Transparency
High Quality Certifications
Other Topics
Ranking: Top 25%

Company ranks in the top 25% of companies currently rated by Hilde in the

Baby

industry

Ranking: Bottom 25%

Company ranks in the bottom 25% of companies currently rated by Hilde in the

Baby

industry

Hilde Likes

Informed code of conduct

This company has a supplier code of conduct that is based on international guidance from credible sources

More supply chain transparency

This company provides some useful information about where they source raw materials and where their products are manufactured

Opportunities for Improvement

Verification of benefits for people efforts

This company should start using or expand their use of high-quality certifications related to strengthen their claims related to creating benefits for people

Category Description

Our ingredient safety evaluation criteria are designed to help us determine how a company measures, manages, and discloses, the use of chemicals of concern that may be present in raw materials, ingredients, manufacturing processes, and finished products.

Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Criteria included in this category include but are not limited to goals, policies, practices and outcomes for the following topics:

Mission Integration
Advocacy
Public Reporting & Disclosure
Performance Incentives
Ethical AI
High Quality Certifications
Ranking: Top 25%

Company ranks in the top 25% of companies currently rated by Hilde in the

Baby

industry

Ranking: Bottom 25%

Company ranks in the bottom 25% of companies currently rated by Hilde in the

Baby

industry

Hilde Likes
None Identified
Opportunities for Improvement

Providing public disclosure and reporting

We think this company should start publishing regular annual reports on sustainability or ESG topics for consumers or other stakeholders and maintain a publicly available archive of past reports

Category Description

Our ingredient safety evaluation criteria are designed to help us determine how a company measures, manages, and discloses, the use of chemicals of concern that may be present in raw materials, ingredients, manufacturing processes, and finished products.

Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Real people (not AI) do our evaluations. If you think you see something we missed, please contact us. You can read more about our company evaluation methods and check some of the limitations of our evaluations. The content on this site, including for example the evaluations and ratings, are for informational purposes and represent solely the opinions of Hilde. They do not represent endorsements or investment advice. Hilde makes no promises regarding the content of its site, including without limitation its accuracy, quality, completeness, and timeliness. Accordingly, Hilde is not liable for any loss or damage that might arise from reliance on the content of the site. For more information, visit our Terms of use.