All-Clad

Evaluation Completed: 
August 27, 2025
Adults

All-Clad is owned by the company Groupe SEB. Hilde evaluates parent companies rather than individual brands. You can read more about why we think this approach is more helpful for consumers on our blog.

Groupe SEB owns a variety of kitchen brands sold in both the U.S. and internationally. We like that a number of the brands owned by the company offer cookware made with materials like stainless steel and cast iron that tend to be safer options for these kinds of products. That said, the company’s unwillingness to phase out fluorinated compounds (e.g. PTFE) from their non-stick products was a major ingredient safety red flag for us. Their poor performance on the ingredient safety portion of our evaluation is the primary reason the company doesn’t get a better overall rating. There were a variety of other elements of their sustainability and accountability efforts that score well for our criteria. We see indicators that the company is making progress on some topics like living wages in their supply chain. If you do decide to purchase products from one of the brands owned by this company like All-Clad, go with the stainless steel options.

Hilde Status:

Avoid

Consider

Recommended

We try to avoid purchasing or using products made by this company or their brands in our homes.
We may decide to purchase or use products made by this company or their brands in our homes when other options are not accessible.
Hilde Ratings
Topic
Rating
Ingredient Safety
Environmental impact
People Benefits
Governance
Hilde Approved Certifications
No Hilde approved certifications included
Hilde Likes

Choosing inherently safer raw materials

Linking incentives & sustainability performance

Nature & biodiversity protection

Respecting worker’s right to organize

Science-based climate protection goal

Solid responsible sourcing efforts

Using circular design thinking

Opportunities for Improvement

Committing to living wages

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions

Transitioning to a more protective ingredient safety approach

Benchmarking ingredient safety practices

Adopting a context-based approach to sustainability

Verification of environmental impact reduction efforts

Providing paid maternity leave

Verification of ingredient safety efforts

Additional Information
Parent Company:
Groupe SEB
Owned Brands:
None
Product Types:
Cookware, bakeware

Evaluation Summary

Basic
Advanced
Leadership
Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Hilde Likes

Choosing inherently safer raw materials

This company chooses to make some products out of raw materials (e.g. glass, steel, iron, wood) that tend to be inherently safer when they are not coated or treated with other chemicals

Opportunities for Improvement

Benchmarking ingredient safety practices

We would like to see this company participate in the Chemical Footprint Policy to help benchmark their policies and practices against other companies publicly share their results

Transitioning to a more protective ingredient safety approach

This company has framework for evaluating ingredient safety but we would like to see them move from a risk-based approach to a more precautionary one based on hazard

Verification of ingredient safety efforts

We think this company should start using or expand the use of high-quality certifications that help verify their claims related to ingredient safety

Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Hilde Likes

Nature & biodiversity protection

This company appears to have a holistic approach to identifying and attempting to manage impacts to ecosystems that provide important raw materials for their products

Science-based climate protection goal

We’re happy to see that this brand has publicly committed to reducing their carbon footprint in ways that are aligned with the latest science.

Using circular design thinking

We appreciate that this company appears to be integrating more circular approaches to designing and making products and packaging to help reduce environmental impacts

Opportunities for Improvement

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions

This company needs to rapidly reduce GHG emissions to achieve the reductions necessary to protect people & the planet and achieve their goals

Verification of environmental impact reduction efforts

This company should start using or expand their use of high-quality certifications related to strengthen their claims related to environmental impact reduction

Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Hilde Likes

Respecting worker’s right to organize

This company appears to have helpful policies and practices in place when it comes to organized labor and collective bargaining for employees

Solid responsible sourcing efforts

This company appears to identify the right priorities and have a credible approach to improving the sustainability of their supply chain.

Opportunities for Improvement

Committing to living wages

We think this company has the policies and resources necessary to make a formal commitment to living wages for the people working in their supply chain

Providing paid maternity leave

We would like to see this company adopt a paid maternity leave policy for their employees that goes beyond regulatory requirements and share it publicly

Foundational Gaps

The company does not meet sufficient baseline criteria for this category and has many opportunities for improvement.

Solid Baseline

The company meets most of our basic criteria and sometimes demonstrates a deeper commitment than other companies on issues in this category.

Strong Performance:

The company appears to be a top performer in this evaluation category and exhibits leadership on one or more of the issues we evaluate.

Hilde Likes

Linking incentives & sustainability performance

This company links incentives for key internal stakeholders to performance on sustainability goals and objectives to help drive action

Opportunities for Improvement

Adopting a context-based approach to sustainability

We think this company is ready to take a leadership position by measuring and managing performance against planetary boundaries and thresholds to assess true operational sustainability

Real people (not AI) do our evaluations. If you think you see something we missed, please contact us. You can read more about our company evaluation methods and check some of the limitations of our evaluations. The content on this site, including for example the evaluations and ratings, are for informational purposes and represent solely the opinions of Hilde. They do not represent endorsements or investment advice. Hilde makes no promises regarding the content of its site, including without limitation its accuracy, quality, completeness, and timeliness. Accordingly, Hilde is not liable for any loss or damage that might arise from reliance on the content of the site. For more information, visit our Terms of use.